There have been several treatises written by many much more skilled than I dealing with the sturm und drang surrounding Indycar and it's TV ratings (which is oft used by media and advertising folks to indicate its relative popularity in our culture, and, in some cases, to indicate relative worth in the commercial marketplace) so I shall not attempt to add to it.
Oh, wait. I already have. Back in 2012, here. Another one of quality by our long lost comrade in Indycar arms, Pressdog, can be read here. Read those in your free time later. For now, just understand that we've covered much of this ground before, and reference the continually, relatively small TV ratings outside the Indy 500 as a backdrop to this post.
Today's Indycar Word of the Day is: Esoteric
esoteric adjective es·o·ter·ic \ˌe-sə-ˈter-ik, -ˈte-rik\
1 a : designed for or understood by the specially initiated alone (a body of esoteric legal doctrine — B. N. Cardozo)
b : requiring or exhibiting knowledge that is restricted to a small group (esoteric terminology); broadly, difficult to understand (esoteric subjects)
2 a : limited to a small circle (in esoteric pursuits)
b : private, confidential (an esoteric purpose)
3 : of special, rare, or unusual interest (esoteric building materials)
For this writer, attempting to express ideas through words are typically a source fun and 'esoteric' is among the most enjoyable for me to throw out in conversation or print. Regardless, I find this word especially useful to frame what I saw as a very good race at Long Beach last weekend.
.jpg)
Oh, wait. I already have. Back in 2012, here. Another one of quality by our long lost comrade in Indycar arms, Pressdog, can be read here. Read those in your free time later. For now, just understand that we've covered much of this ground before, and reference the continually, relatively small TV ratings outside the Indy 500 as a backdrop to this post.
Today's Indycar Word of the Day is: Esoteric
esoteric adjective es·o·ter·ic \ˌe-sə-ˈter-ik, -ˈte-rik\
1 a : designed for or understood by the specially initiated alone (a body of esoteric legal doctrine — B. N. Cardozo)
b : requiring or exhibiting knowledge that is restricted to a small group (esoteric terminology); broadly, difficult to understand (esoteric subjects)
2 a : limited to a small circle (in esoteric pursuits)
b : private, confidential (an esoteric purpose)
3 : of special, rare, or unusual interest (esoteric building materials)
For this writer, attempting to express ideas through words are typically a source fun and 'esoteric' is among the most enjoyable for me to throw out in conversation or print. Regardless, I find this word especially useful to frame what I saw as a very good race at Long Beach last weekend.
For a sport that is already quite esoteric, to continually heap upon the negative comparisons to the glorious past of 50 (or even 25 years ago) serves no good.
You may think you're doing the sport a great service, but you're not. It is pure folly and unfairly shackles the sport to something it cannot possibly be. It reminds me of a younger sibling who becomes a freshman in high school, only to continually suffer the unfair comparisons by possibly more glorious elder siblings' friends and teachers. To have these comparisons and judgements awaiting you, before you have a chance to develop your own identity, would be highly infuriating. Perhaps you were just such a sibling and can identify with this feeling, but I digress...
My point to all this can be summed up by a quote I came across yesterday attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe - influential writer, statesman, and all-round free-thinker from late-1700s/early-1800s Germany. The english translation of his quote is,
"the hardest thing to see is what is in front of your eyes".
What is currently (and has been for a few years) in front of our eyes is the gilding of a new group of Indycar legends.
Yet nobody seems to care.
Scott Dixon scored his 36th career win in Indycar at Long Beach last weekend, surpassing the golden-era legend Bobby Unser, and moving to 5th all-time, a full year quicker and in 17 less starts that 'Uncle Bobby'.
Let that sink in for a bit.
I'm not going to attempt arguments which bring in subjective comparisons based on the sport or vehicle history - only the hardest, most basic statistics. We can certainly view them all through the lens of their time but I find it increasingly hard to say one era is better than another based on conditions of the time. Liars figure and figures lie, correct?
We are in a time when new legends such as Scott Dixon, Helio Castroneves, Sebastien Bourdais recently retireds Dario Franchitti and Paul Tracy, ALL are in the top 15 in career wins.
These drivers, some of whom are permanently gone from the cockpit, or likely soon to be, are legends in their own right, yet most often we only hear and celebrate the voices of those who continually lob mortars at the sport's façade, quite unfairly damaging this current generation of legends. The worst thing, the absolute WORST we do as fans is depreciate their status.
 |
| (c) Jeff Gritchen - OC Register |
I'm making an concerted effort to eliminate the unfair comparisons with the sport's past. The drivers of today are legends in their own right, living in the shadows of the sport's earlier legends, yet they've earned the right to be treated as such.
The subdued congratulations from TK and Helio on Sunday, seemed akin to a knowing nod that despite the weight of golden-era legends and their esoteric, nostalgic fans before them, they do understand their place in the sport's pantheon.
If only more Indycar fans did as well.
